Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

NevGold Corp T.NAU


Primary Symbol: V.NAU Alternate Symbol(s):  NAUFF

NevGold Corp. is a Canada-based exploration and development company targeting large-scale mineral systems in the districts of Nevada and Idaho. The Company owns a 100% interest in the Limousine Butte and Cedar Wash gold projects in Nevada, and the Nutmeg Mountain gold project and Zeus copper project in Idaho. The Limousine Butte Project is located within the Basin and Range physiographic province of east-central Nevada. The deposits of the Limousine Butte Project are Carlin-type deposits, sediment-hosted, with disseminated gold. The Nutmeg property consists of approximately 1,724 hectares and comprises 210 federal unpatented lode mining claims, 12 patented claims, and two leases of private land. Its Cedar Wash project is a high-potential, advanced exploration prospect located in Lincoln County, 75 kilometers southeast of Pioche, on the southern flank of the Clover Mountains. Zeus copper project is approximately 40 kilometers northwest of the Nutmeg Mountain gold project.


TSXV:NAU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by delta_noon Oct 02, 2007 3:36pm
95 Views
Post# 13509086

DCF-valuation - an example (1 of 2)

DCF-valuation - an example (1 of 2)I don’t know if any of you are interested in understanding going concern valuations. If you are, you can study my modelling of Stora Sahavaara below. If not, you can ignore my posting. Derivation of Discounted Cash Flow-calculation of Stora Sahavaara (USD 3,03 per NAUR-share per year end 2007): 145 mill. tonnes of magnetit: Resource base declared acc. to NI 43-101 105 mill. tonnes of magnetit: anticipated additional resource base in the future =250 mill. tonnes of magnetit: anticipated resource base in DCF-calculation (going concern) 43% Fe: Iron content in-situ in magnetit 67% Fe: Concentrate grade in iron ore pellet feed (after beneficiation) (reference to NAU-message 2007) 10%: Iron losses during upgrading process (as for LKAB in 2006) 57,89%: Weight yield iron ore pellet feed = (43-10)/(67-10)*100 2%: Weight increase during pelletsing process (because of additive materials) 59,05%: Weight yield iron ore pellets (saleable weight) = 57,89*1,02 147.630 mill. tonnes of saleable pellets during anticipated mine life = 250*0,5905 29,5 years: anticipated mine life in DCF-calculation = 147.630/5 mill. tonnes pellets annually 65,6% Fe: Iron content in saleable pellets product (reference to NAU-message Oct. 2, 2007) 110 USc per Fe-unit (%): Iron ore product price (Blast Furnace-pellets similar to LKAB), average USc per Fe-unit over mine life expressed in the value of 2006-money, and nominal price increase is assumed to 2% p.a. 2007-contract price is 131 USc per Fe-unit (as for LKAB). Anticipated increase of at least 20% (could be 25-35%) to 2008 to at least USc 157 per Fe-unit. Current spot price of Indian iron ore exported to China is about 40% above Brazilian contract price for 2007 when the Indian price is converted to FOB-Brazil-equivalents. For Hannukainen the long term price assumption is a 10% premium on the Stora Sahavaara pellets because Hannukainen is assumed producing only Direct Reduction-pellets. If we assume a pellets price spot equivalent today is 40% above 2007-contract price, the long term price assumption in the DCF-model is 40% below todays spotprice equivalent (100%-110/(131*1,4)*100%= 40%). 72,16 USD per tonne of saleable pellets: Iron ore product price (average USD/tonne over mine life) expressed in value of 2006-money = 110*0,656 1,80 USD per tonne pellets: Net smelter royalty (2,5%) to Anglo American = 72,16*0,025 41,64 USD per tonne pellets: All operating costs excl. depreciation/amortization and net smelter royalty expressed in value of 2006-money. Equivalent to LKABs 2006-cost level in SEK adjusted for today foreign exchange rates (USDSEK= 6,50), open pit cost advantage for NAUR (the first 15 years) and lower in-situ Fe in Stora Sahavaara compared to the LKAB-average, and Northland’s cost level upped with higher freight costs (to a freight level of USD 5-6/tonne as indicated on AGM Sept. 18, 2007) and increased energy costs due to increasing energy prices. Consists of the sum of freight, cash costs in producing pellets and fixed expenses (sales, general and administration, R&D). 2,18 USD per tonne pellets: Capital expenses related to maintenence expressed in value of 2006-money 26,54 USD per tonne pellets: average net cashflow during mine life expressed in value of 2006-money = 72,16-1,80-41,64-2,18 132,7 mill. USD total net cash flow annually from pellets = 26,54 * 5 mill. tonnes annually (continued)
Bullboard Posts

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse