Silk Energy Ltd SLKEF

RE: RE: Drilling Results (Putz)

[TexasTea20]

Lie or a BLUNDER........whatever. A search of SEDAR reveals no evidence of a 43-101 in October of 2005. No mention of any 43-101 other than the August 23,2007 effort. I'm reading on page 81 where it says "This first NI43-101 compliant resource estimate should serve as a starting point, which should continually be upadated and improved as additional data and interpretations become available..." Drilling goes back to 03, "present management" or not. Was any of that data or data obtained prior to "present management" used in the August 43-101? Of course you have the ISM dates pretty much right but fudge, waffle, weasle with respect to LBE. You now what Putz...maybe its just me but I would follow Dundee's lead way before yours. Putz, the point here is that ISM has not spent an unreasonable amoung of time getting a 43-101 out at all. It just isn't time sport. As I have stated there is plenty of money in the bank so plenty of time to do things right. I bet that is exactly what they are doing. Thankfully you and your tiresome bunch of bashers don't call the shots over at ISM even though in your twisted little world you like to think you have some influence. That LBE 43-101 sure has made a big impact on the shareprice huh Putz. Perhaps if LBE management would have spent a little longer looking for Nickel rather than rushing off and building a mill they could have created a little more shareholder value to date. ISM's strategy will prove to be the right strategy.