Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Spyder Cannabis Inc. V.SPDR

Spyder Cannabis Inc is a cannabis retailer. The company is engaged in selling electronic cigarettes, cannabis supplies, Ejuice, and accessories for the vape business.


TSXV:SPDR - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by ElJon Jan 02, 2008 1:40am
164 Views
Post# 14140070

RE: sp

RE: spOne of the items that people seem to not fully consider in share buy-back is the cost(funds flowing out of the organization) to achieve the buy-back. In the case of ANGOSS, if I understand correctly, the cost of the proposed re-structuring is of the order of $1 million and in a company with less than $7.5 million market capitalization, the re-structure cost of approx. $1 million is significant......IMHO the figure of $1.02 reflects as little management assessment competence as the ANGOSS product pricing stategy over the past 4 years. For shareholders who bought into ANGOSS during the Tech bubble at prices between $3(i.e. $20,997 for 6999 shares) and $8.40(i.e $58,791), to now find their management offering them no choice of continuing to hold, but be forced to increase their holdings or accept $1,260 buy-back in "both example cases", is nothing short of disgraceful IMHO. I was a seller during the high-tech bubble and have since picked-up shares during 2004 and 2005 at trivial prices (in the $0.11 to $0.13 range), but I certainly sympathize with small shareholders here who bought-in at higher price levels, Peace, Good Decision-making to All, ElJ
Bullboard Posts