RE: triple et alHi Don-Sorry about the confusion.That statement was only my opionion.
I can only repeat what I said. I spoke with Blake. "We have not
won!"
EPS's primary contention in response to Erin's claims was to state that the legal action by Erin should be disregarded by the arbitration court, arguing that the statute of limitations had expired on the claim. The arbitration court members ruled unanimously that, in fact, Erin's claim remains in good standing, and will be adjudicated by the court.
Just out of curiosity Don what kind of defense would EPS use now that their claim of statute of limitations had expired was inadmissible.If I'm not mistaken I think EV can also produce checks that were written for concession fee's which at that time Serbia was cashing.Maybe someone can jump in and correct me if I'm wrong.