GREY:VMSTF - Post by User
Comment by
tentongoldon Jan 29, 2008 8:30pm
173 Views
Post# 14285713
RE: THE MOST PROMINENT INDICATOR
RE: THE MOST PROMINENT INDICATORTentongold, POSTED BY LONGONZINC
They announced 6 cores with near solid sulphides and put out assays on three of them. These were the moderate grade zinc cores. Its seems unlikely, that cores 14 and 20 will contain high grade copper based on their location relative to the other zinc intercepts reported.
If core 12 contains high grade copper it will only confirm hole 2. I don't see the point or logic to what you trying to say. Todays results were disappointing, we now know a lot more about where the high grade copper isn't located but we learned little about where it might be located.
LONGON, YOU SAID, They announced 6 cores with near solid sulphides and put out assays on three of them
WRONG, THEY ANNOUNCED 5 HOLES VIA THE TEXT AND 6 ON THE TABLE.
THATS 2 NON SOLID SULPHIDE ZINC CORES NUMBERS 7 AND 10 IN THE TEXT AND ON THE TABLE WITH ASSAYS.
AND 3 HOLES, NUMBERS 12, 14 AND 20 WITH NEAR SOLID SULPHIDES, ASSAYS PENDING IN THE TEXT AND 4 HOLES WITH NEAR SOLID SULPHIDES ASSAYS PENDING ADD HOLE NUMBER 16 ON THE TABLE.
BASED ON THESE MISTAKES MADE BY YOU THE REST OF YOUR OPINION IS ENTIRELY MERITLESS.
SORRY, THEMS THE FACTS, READ THE SMALL PRINT AT THE BOTTOM OF THE TABLE OF ASSAYS IF YOU CAN.