Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Snowfield Development Corp. SWFCF

Metals & Mining Industrial Metals & Minerals


GREY:SWFCF - Post by User

Snowfield Development Corp.
Bullboard Posts
User Avatar Image
(0)
•••
Comment by HotSnoton Feb 10, 2008 12:08am
246 Views
Post# 14345739

RE: Question

RE: QuestionYou are correct, the totals do not add up and this was corrected in a later news release already. If you look you will find it. 100 tons is not 100,000 kg's. Your right, yor not a mathmetician. 100 tons of rock was removed knowing that a certain amount of it would contain kimberlite which is a molten rock from millions of years ago which has the potential to contain diamonds. SNO verified that this kimberlite has diamonds already.
Bullboard Posts
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities