Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Snowfield Development Corp. SWFCF



GREY:SWFCF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by GDAWG77on Mar 03, 2008 11:52am
287 Views
Post# 14585710

Comparing HUD to SNO is like comparing TAH to

Comparing HUD to SNO is like comparing TAH toSNO. HUD has a few big rocks they found in the middle of nowhere. SNO found 44 diamonds on just a sample drill. HUD's location sucks, SNO's is pretty much as good as it gets. Unless HUD pulls out some 10-20 carat diamonds, it wont take off.
Bullboard Posts