Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Snowfield Development Corp. SWFCF



GREY:SWFCF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by norisknoreward1on Apr 04, 2008 12:10pm
64 Views
Post# 14939024

An answer for Glass

An answer for GlassWhy the persistence glass? You made your point time and time again regarding hematite. No one on the 
SH board or Angoracom has the definitive answer you are seeking. Its time for you to pursue this matter outside the bullboard arena. If your concern is a scientific one take it to the scholars at a reputable university.

Let me give you the answer you are looking for, which is based on no credible information known to me.

Answer: hematite did not interfear with the SRC results. Only four diamonds ever existed in the sample tested, no more, no less. All the efforts of SNO re-processing the sample results is wasted energy and money. No additional diamonds will be found using a caustic process.  There are no diamonds in any kimberlite pipes identified by SNO. The science applied by the expert geologists is flawed. Hematite will make diamond mining uneconomical.

Have a nice day.
Bullboard Posts