Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Isotechnika Pharma Inc IPHAF



GREY:IPHAF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by labumbaon May 29, 2008 12:14pm
436 Views
Post# 15123152

RE: Most of my info is on ISA website.

RE: Most of my info is on ISA website. 
 
" What got me started digging when Phase 2b started was a simple question:  "Why are these guys comparing 247 to Tacrolimus when it seems they want to market it head to head with cyclosporin?"

I have always assumed that Foster et al may be arrogant but not stupid.  They started as academics themselves and that is one cut throat, backstabing world.  "

What is your implication ?
Are you saying Tacrolimus is superior than 247 in terms of  " acute rejection " ?  I think its still too early to conclude before the final results presented in the ATC.
Just a reminder,  every kind of parameter data includes its means and median numbers among all dosing groups as compiled in the intermin results.
Bullboard Posts