RE: Coal Permit map - Ed
Why don't we take it a step further in analysis?
Compare the WGF map to this map. You'll see the area immediately to the north of the GXS confirmed area indicates 'coal applications by others' (not WGF). I would have thought that GXS would have applied for that area as part of their original application package; and you would have thought that they did since you see those two odd active strips up there that must belong to them.
Now it appears to me that there upwards of 50,000 hectares up there (between WGF and GXS) that have not been granted to GXS (if they did indeed apply for them). Does anyone know of any other company that has stated that they applied to the area north of, and adjoining GXS?
It's only about 15 to 20 kms away from the GXS target zone. Seems like some nice land to get permits for....
If anybody is still thinking about a 'trump', getting this land might be up for consideration.
IMO, the question is of course..... who's got it staked?
.