Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Diamonds North Resources Ltd V.DDN



TSXV:DDN - Post by User

Comment by BabyE88on Jul 08, 2008 9:17am
324 Views
Post# 15267178

RE: BOUGHT MORE TODAY

RE: BOUGHT MORE TODAYI have to disagree with you. Given the fact that DDN has more upside potential on Nickel play. The deal never gives any credit to it. The nickel batteries in hybrid cars will be the key to energy solution in the years to come. So, I feel management needed to let these sharks to be aware of this. $1/share for nickel and $0.5/share for diamonds. That's all, otherwise, NO DEAL!!!

John Kaiser made a very good point that this one should be much higher in months ahead, so why not convertible bonds pay 6% interest or  redeemable @ $2/share in a year. You are not waiting for these sharks to make the call, right? Of course, if they have no balls to make the discovery, the deal seems to be reasonable.

Why should they be undersold themselves at the FIRST place? Answer my question????
Bullboard Posts