Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Goldsource Mines Inc GXSFF


Primary Symbol: V.GXS

Goldsource Mines Inc. is a Canada-based resource company, which is engaged in exploration activities. The Company is focused on the Eagle Mountain Gold Project (Eagle Mountain) for which it has a 100% interest in the Eagle Mountain Prospecting License (EMPL) and the Kilroy Mining Permit (collectively, the Property). The Property is located approximately seven kilometers (km) south of Mahdia Township (population approximately 3000). Mahdia Township can be accessed by road from Georgetown, a driving distance of approximately 325 km, or via air by a commercial flight. The Property consists of an area of approximately 5,050 hectares (ha) (12,480 acres) in central Guyana, South America. 4,784 hectares (11,820 acres) of the Eagle Mountain Property relate to the EMPL while 266 ha (660 acres) relate to the Medium Scale Mining Permit held by Kilroy Mining Inc. (Kilroy), on which the Company has a long-term lease with a 2% net smelter return royalty.


TSXV:GXS - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by crockyon Jul 20, 2008 8:32pm
271 Views
Post# 15310958

RE: BD08-01 ...First stepout hole

RE: BD08-01 ...First stepout holeHT , I'm glad that you have taken the time to do the math for these guys. That USGS site clearly lays out the methodology for inferred , indicated and measured coal from individual holes. What you have done is by the book and not open for debate. What may be open for discussion is the category that each person here is suggesting, be it inferred, indicated or measured. I don't really care about measured at this point and I believe that the exceptional thickness of this coal seam means that you can comfortably increase the indicated from the inferred resource. As this story unfolds we'll be able to plug in more numbers with greater confidence. I sure hope that the company provides the new numbers as we go along within whatever confidence levels are appropriate.
It sure gets tiring not having an established methodology on this board that people will agree on. This stuff should not be open to interpretation.
Crocky
Bullboard Posts