Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Isotechnika Pharma Inc IPHAF



GREY:IPHAF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by go4futureon Jul 21, 2008 7:38pm
282 Views
Post# 15314734

Roche = Anonymous ?

Roche = Anonymous ?Was it the opinion of this board that Roche could not legally be the Anomymous seller due to their legal agreement with Isotechnika, access to material knowledge etc?

If so and if Roche was the Anomymous seller are they not open to a lawsuit by other shareholders since they had insider knowledge and used it to their advantage knowing they would not opt-in?

No Sedar reports have been filed from Roche since their stake was less than 10% or for selling relating to material knowledge. I would assume that they still own the ~7.3 Million shares and were legally bound not to sell by the agreement and/or insider material knowledge not disclosed.  
Bullboard Posts