Avaition industry has not used the product...Not cAviation industry use of the product was a discussion in a news release a few years ago. Even with the higher cost of fuel, i fail to see that plastic circuitry would be cheaper ofr save on gas. The weight issue is questionable as it takes more plastic to form a circuit then it takes in metal( copper or other wise) So where is the actual weight savings? There wouldn't be any or the industry would have adopted the plastics years ago as a cost savings.
Where it might have value is that it is more flamable and combustrable in a fire situation. more smoke means less survival trate on planes. Wouldn't there be more resistance in current in he plastic that could cause heating and combustion? Obviously these concerns have been addressed over the past few years and that is why the aviation companies have not used electroplast. That and it cost way more than lighter weight aluminum. Let's see some products and the cost to produce before one states that there is a cost savings to the airlines or planes.
This articled is only to get speculation gamblers to prop up the price without seeing the costs and savings i real numbers which the aviation industry has already done and has refused to use electroplast. mamagement has to show numbers and not speculation of smoke and mirrors as in the past. There is no market developing only hope that speculators will push the price higher for shares. This is not happening as there is no market in aviation willing to use the product at the higher costs.
Still a value at $0.10 AS THIS STOCK COULD EASILY GO OFF THE MARKET. Show sales and costs verses fictitious savings that aren[t there or the aviation industry would use the product and ITKG would have more than $1000.00 income over the life of the company.