RE: The return of the hickster.I paid them for their names and rarely did they contribute more than that.
Once again, you reveal more about your own personal endorsement of sleazy business practices and willingness to say "whatever it takes" to win your point Lightweight. Not exactly a comforting trait in an anonymous financial advisor.
I also run my own business, and it isn't associated with mining. But I'm quite aware of the sleazy deals that take place in every type of industry. You would have us believe that all businesses practice the same back-room deal mentality as you "CLAIM" to have employed during your "CLAIMED" illustrious career. I happen to know that isn't true.
Unlike you, I've only seen it, I haven't done it and I KNOW that many businesses do concern themselves with ethics and are genuinely trying to build something as opposed to "appearing" to build something as you admit to have done and are claiming NAG is doing.
You employ quite the two-faced approach to these issues Lightweight. Can't say enough nice things about the guys that tripped over the coal (GXS), but can't say enough negative things about a company that is systematically moving towards production (NAG).
You're motives are pretty easy to see through to any one here if they merely employ some common sense.
I would strongly suggest that people do their own due diligence and taking nothing from these boards, (including my posts), without satisfying themselves as to the accuracy and practicality of the information. Would you agree Lightweight? Or do you hope people will be naive enough to swallow your Vancouver back alley approach hook, line, and sinker?
HH