Comparative Performance of 10 Stocks
| | | | | | % From | % From | % From |
| | 52Wk Hi | 52Wk Low | Close | Change | Prev Close | 52Wk Hi | 52Wk Low |
| NAG | 0.65 | 0.05 | 0.15 | -0.01 | -6.3 | -76.9 | 200.0 |
| GXS | 19.6 | 0.16 | 2.44 | -0.54 | -18.1 | -87.6 | 1425.0 |
| WER | 1.28 | 0.08 | 0.185 | -0.03 | -14.0 | -85.5 | 131.3 |
| GM | 0.88 | 0.1 | 0.12 | -0.015 | -11.1 | -86.4 | 20.0 |
| WGF | 1.38 | 0.15 | 0.255 | -0.025 | -8.9 | -81.5 | 70.0 |
| CEC | 0.72 | 0.12 | 0.22 | -0.02 | -8.3 | -69.4 | 83.3 |
| PEX | 0.3 | 0.05 | 0.065 | 0 | 0.0 | -78.3 | 30.0 |
| RAY | 2.05 | 0.145 | 0.42 | -0.04 | -8.7 | -79.5 | 189.7 |
| WHD | 0.62 | 0.1 | 0.205 | -0.025 | -10.9 | -66.9 | 105.0 |
| NGM | 0.47 | 0.09 | 0.21 | -0.04 | -16.0 | -55.3 | 133.3 |
NAG is 2nd in sustaining the least loss from theprevious session and in 4th place in terms of least loss from 52 wkhigh.
It shows that all the bashers’ effort has once again failedto move the stock in any major way even coupled with the tsunami devastatingworld-wide financial markets.
No consolation to majority of us seeing mostly red on ourinvestments, and in some unfortunate cases have to be liquidated just to cope.The painful decisions come down to whether sell those with the least losses toraise the most funds, or retain the strongest and most promising ones that mayproduce the most profits in the future.
If the second approach is chosen the correct decisions canonly be made if the individual situation of each stock is well understoodbefore and after we put our money in. This tumultuous time highlights theimportance of DD we always talk about but may not have been done properly. Ifnot, then we fall victims to the recurring exploitive bashing, pumping and nowmarket turbulence.
Something to think about!
KT