Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Questerre Energy Corp (Canada) T.QEC

Alternate Symbol(s):  QTEYF

Questerre Energy Corporation is an energy technology and innovation company. It is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of oil and gas projects, in specific non-conventional projects such as tight oil, oil shale, shale oil and shale gas. It holds assets in Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Quebec in Canada, as well as in the Kingdom of Jordan (Jordan). Its oil shale assets include its project in Jordan and its investment in Red Leaf Resources Inc. (Red Leaf). It plans to utilize the Red Leaf technology for its project in the Kingdom of Jordan. In Quebec, the project has a comprehensive program to test the carbon storage potential including injection and monitoring wells, compression facilities and a pipeline to an adjacent industrial park. Its Kakwa area is a liquids-rich Montney natural gas resource play situated over 75 kilometers (km) south of Grande Prairie in west central Alberta. Its Antler area is over 200 km southeast of Regina in southeast Saskatchewan.


TSX:QEC - Post by User

Comment by coolbeon Oct 09, 2008 3:33pm
538 Views
Post# 15517121

WRE: Economics of play

WRE: Economics of play

WHAT WE FOUND – DRILLING DEEPER INTO THE

MODEL

First determine if economic, then calculate value. By calculating NPV on a per

well basis we are able to determine economic cutoffs under a variety of assumptions.

After all, if a single well does not meet the hurdle rate of either NPV or payback, then

calculating value using acreage is meaningless. The land reverts back to its intrinsic

value as farmland. We suggest that development begins with a binary decision on a

per well basis, value is essentially zero if uneconomic, and something if economic.

This provides us with a framework with which to analyze future news on Utica well

performance. Under a variety of well cost and natural gas price assumptions, we

can determine at what base level the IP rate of a well reaches its economic hurdle

rate. Then we can extrapolate value by land, prospectivity, infill drilling potential from

expected reserves recovery, time to bring on all the wells, and finally incremental net

asset value (NAV) per fully diluted share to QEC.

If horizontal IP = 1,000 mcf/d, economic at US$8.00/mmbtu. Using our base

case assumptions of an average cost per well of $3.5 million, operating costs of

$1.50/mcf, a discount rate of 10% before tax for NPV and a 5 year payback cutoff, we

find that a 1.0 mmcf/d IP rate from a horizontal well will be economic with natural gas

prices at or above US$8.00/mmbtu.

If horizontal IP = 1,500 mcf/d, economic at US$5.50/mmbtu. Again using our

base case assumptions, we find that a 1.5 mmcf/d IP rate from a horizontal well will

be economic with natural gas prices at or above US$5.50/mmbtu. Now considering

that we believe a vertical IP rate should be at least 500 mcf/d from a typical Utica well

and a reasonable multiple of a horizontal over a vertical is between 2-3 times, we

expect to see rates between 1.0 – 1.5 mmcf/d or better.

If horizontal IP = 2,000 mcf/d or greater, economic at almost any price. Again

using our base case assumptions, we find at 1.9 mmcf/d wells are economic as low

as US$4.50/mmbtu. Now considering that this long term price level for natural gas is

well below market expectations by even the most bearish on the street, we conclude

that at IP rates of 2.0 mmcf/d or greater, wells are economic at almost any price.

Victor Rodberg, CFA

vrodberg@dundeesecurities.com

(403) 268-7426

Bullboard Posts