RE: RE: faithful followers
Pretty funny that they screwed up again and failed to get samples big enough to be meaningful. Now we know why those assay results didn't come in September, because the inputs to the assayer weren't big enough.
If it weren't for having amazingly good rocks, this company's management would sink the company. I think what we learned today is that what we have is a competency situation (with great rocks to make up for) rather than a fraud situation.
Hopefully they have some guys in place who can at least do the exploration right.
Sheesh,
MontyHigh