RE: once again..
The problem was we were expecting real assay results and instead, they screwed up by not giving the right kind of inputs to the assayer, and we got this lame excuse for assay results in the news release.
Its not the wording of the release that was disappointing, but the screwup and lack of real results.
So, we are back to:
(a) It looks like there's a lot of gold. As Toby said recently, even more gold than we hoped for given the expanse of the mineralized zone.
(b) We are still months from having any reliable exploration results. Who knows how much dilution these extra months will cost us. Hopefully that have genuine experts doing the sampling and the next set of results will be valid.
That's how I see it.
MontyHigh