Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF T.SST.U


Primary Symbol: SPTS

The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg Barclays 1-3 Year U. The fund invests at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index and in securities that the Adviser determines have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the economic characteristics of the securities that comprise the index. The index is designed to measure the performance of short term (1-3 years) public obligations of the U.S. Treasury.


ARCA:SPTS - Post by User

Post by yoyoyo9992on Dec 04, 2008 2:32pm
229 Views
Post# 15627925

SST operating costs

SST operating costsI contacted management to get a better handle of the operating costs at Cozamin, Minto, and Neves-Corvo to get a better idea of the impact of copper prices, and also to refute the blind assumptions of some on this board that $0.40 zinc and lead will cause operating costs to rise to $1.50/lb. 

First off, that math is not only wrong, it is on another planet.  If the poster actually believes that, they are either extremely bad financial modelers or shorts intending to scare people out.

Second, this is what I learned.

Cozamin's operating cost in 2009, BEFORE hedges, will be about $1.05-$1.10 lb. of copper INCLUDING zinc and lead around the current prices.  Actually, Cozamin's zinc recoveries are very low to start with (around 50%), so it never really was a big contributor to start with.  Additionally, they have hedged roughly 30% of production for at least three years at about $3.15/lb.

Minto's operating cost in 2009, BEFORE hedges, will be about $0.90-$1.00/lb. of copper INCLUDING zinc and lead around the current prices.  Additionally, they have hedged roughly 50% of production for the next three years at $2.44/lb.

Neves-Corvo's operating cost in 2009, BEFORE HEDGES, will be about $1.25/lb. of copper INCLUDING base metal prices at around current levels.  However, due to the recent discoveries they may try to produce production signficantly from the current plan, which would likely make this $1.25/lb. number fall.  I believe they are now thinking of using the unused Alljustrel mill to process additional copper ore, which would help in this process.  I do not know if they have executed any hedges, but will get that answer shortly.

Moreover, of the roughly 4.5 million Ag equivalent ounces currently planned to be produced next year by SST, only about 0.8 million are anticipated to come from Neves-Corvo.  So unless copper falls to something like $0.75/lb., it is hard to see how any real problems will occur from a counterparty prospective, especially as the great majority of production is coming from Minto and Cozamin, mines that share the same management as Silverstone does.

Who knows what prices will do, but right now I think there's more fear than fact in SST investor expectations.

yoyo
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>