S&J and numbersHere is the link to the NR, although I believe everybody has seen it:
Aberdeen Q3 numbers and S&J trouble
After reading the NR I came to the conclusion that S&J is likely right. Would like to see someone prove me the opposite. The problem is that if the conversion into shares is not obtained by shareholder approval, the facility is de facto converted into a 1% NSR. That seems to be the alternative conversion S&J is speaking of.
They only had a chance of repayment if they never asked for the conversion into shares.
I suspect S&J management is smart enough to make no mistakes in the interpretation of the contract. Although I think Aberdeen Management has no lack of intelligence either, something has gone wrong.
What a pity,
Regards.