Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Wheels Group Inc GRFJF



GREY:GRFJF - Post by User

Comment by keizaigakushaon Dec 20, 2008 10:58am
408 Views
Post# 15659393

RE: RE: Question for the board

RE: RE: Question for the boardI htink some of WGI's resource #'s are misleading.  They actually have around 2.4 million ounces of oxide resources which they intend to mine.  The remaining resources are sulphide based which cannot be used in the heap leaching process WGI currently has in place for oxide material.  In order to mine the sulphide contained gold, they would need to install a mill of sometype that would no doubt be quite an expense.

Once you have the oxide ounces, remember the recovery rate for the leaching process is 67%, so 2.8 million ounces really cranks down to 1.9 million ounces.

I agree this company is undervalued and I am long myself, but I find it misleading for management to quote such aggregate gold ounce #'s when the amount that will actually be mined is far smaller.  Heck, look at Allied Nevada, they have over 7 million ounces of sulphide resource, but they aren't planning on mining it but it is in their total ounce calcs.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>