Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Douglas Lake Minerals Inc DLKM



GREY:DLKM - Post by User

Post by Public_Heelon Dec 31, 2008 11:49am
359 Views
Post# 15674419

Tonne

Tonne

   The lab said "grams per tonne". They have no way of knowing whether the original sample was 19 tonnes, or 6 tonnes or 500,000 tonnes. It is their JOB to NEVER take the miner's word for ANYTHING. Once they do that, their results are useless, or worse than useless. So when they say "tonne", I have to assume they mean a straight extrapolation from the sample they received. They said 70 grams, so I have to assume they actually had 1/200 that much in their 5 kg sample.

  Another thing.... how do you go from 6 tonnes to 5 kg, down 99.9%? They say the 5 kg were "selected". How?
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>