RE: RE: RE: Tonne
Not to beat a (nearly) dead horse, but the NR also said that the samples were taken from areas of "known mineralization". Leaving aside the issue of how they already knew those areas were mineralized, this certainly would imply that the samples are not, by design, representative of the entire deposit.
I still own a little but, instead of thinking that the company is deliberately making things look better than they are (the NR makes things look about as bad as they could), or that their incompetence is skewing the published results to the upside, I think there's at least a chance that, either by incompetance or design, they are making things look worse than they actually are. Given the risk/reward ratio right now, I think that a 10% chance of that justifies still holding a little stock...