RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Contacted Eco Lab...andOK, the lab is saying they assayed the material as grams per ton of CONCENTRATE. This concentrate was extracted from 150 kgs for each sample or somewhere in the range of 19-20 tons of total resource for 131 samples (be it sand, gravel, stone, etc.).
PublicHeel also has his numbers screwed up. If you correlate the results back to the amount of original material (19-20 tons), it works out to 0.35 grams/per ton, not 0.02 grams per ton. Now, if we're using short tons, it's closer to 0.40 grams per metric ton. Don't quote all of my numbers because I'm in a major rush and doing these quick calculations on the run - but be assured that I'm close.
What does all this mean? Absolutely nothing! We're beating a dead horse, one way or the other. Without depths, intervals, plot maps, and a whole lot of other variables, etc. , the results are as useful as t$ts on a bull. We wait for something more meaningful.
HAPPY NEW YEAR EVERYONE!!!!