The truth is, HighTest…….That you sounded so authoritatively to be the holder of the truth is remarkable.
Most of us (not including you) are trying to seek more information as well as answers to questions and mysteries. I gathered bits and pieces of information from various sources and present them for the purpose of sharing DD and invite further discussions such that we may approach closer to the “truth”, just as I indicated in my previous post.
So if you find any fault with my information or reasoning, point them out in clearer terms for the benefit of everyone that care to spend time on reading the board, but do not want to waste any.
There didn’t seem to have been any maths involved in my previous post “RE: RE: World-Class Thickness, retireddriller”. All the numbers involved were taken from AIX map and NR from various companies involved.
There was one typo error in item 5) regarding the WER intercept. It should’ve been ”18 m” instead of “16 m” that I put down. There was no math involved as it appeared clearly on the map to which a link was provided.
As for the CDB map, a poster familiar with its origin and history pointed out earlier that it was not an official company map and the 480 & 200 ft intercept IDs were based on the AIX/GM map, and not the other way round.
So it seems AIX/GM is the original source of the information. Anybody knows more, I invite further discussions, not denunciation.
KT