RE: RE: Seems like the market ...Well, for one thing, the numbers don't add up and its more confusing than ever. By the NR, each sample was 1/10th of a cubic meter. Taking the best statistically significant result numbers, 18.83 g/lcm, we can conclude that they took the 1/10 cubic meter of sand, conglomerate, whatever....and concentrated it down to 26.82 grams. The assay results report 0.01872 grams Au present in that sample. Multiply by ten to extrapolate to a full cubic meter of the virgin sample, and by any math it says 0.1872 grams per cubic meter. There are so many variables here that these results mean nothing.....AGAIN. Interestingly, if you take the 698 ppm aspect, and extrapolate that out to a metric ton of the virgin sample, it still gives you the same result, which indicates 1 cubic meter equaled 1 metric ton. And...what does "split the samples" mean?
I have a lot riding on this stock, so at this point I wish you'd give Harp my email and let me ask the questions BEFORE the NR goes out. I'm more than willing to sign an NC/ND, and just maybe we can get a lucid NR which can't be questioned.