RE: RE: RE: share priceAgreed wmgr it should be a $2.00 stock at minimum.
In one sense, this was a good NR. Though I can not help thinking after all the negative
responses they have had in the past, why did they bother? This company will only
receive legitimacy with a 43-101 or equivalent. That is DLKM's fault which we as
shareholders take the responsibility for with a stock going down the drain.
We did not ....
- mess up a previous release by a factor of 10 (or 1000 depends on whose opinion you listen to)
- infuriate Bob Moriarty into writing a bad NR,
- intentionally leak that a NR is on its way to get the stock into an artificial run up and claim it is
late due to wanting to get it right while getting it wrong ......EVERY TIME!!!
What about the rumors of the Hong Kong exchange? My sources advised me this
was to be in December? Is that not why the new shares were registered?
So many events have occurred that should have made this stock worth ten times more than
what it is currently trading at, but it isn't.
I'll say it again...... I want to run like hell, but is that where I would be running to?
Jasper, you also once said ....... this is a dangerous stock. Yes it is.
Monty, you will have one heck of a story brewing from this experience.
Not investment advice, and VERY GLTA.