Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Uranium One Inc SXRZF



GREY:SXRZF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by Harvey633on Feb 17, 2009 10:06am
451 Views
Post# 15782879

More Trouble for Cameco at Cigar Lake

More Trouble for Cameco at Cigar Lake


More Trouble for Cameco at Cigar Lake

Posted By Uranium Stocks On July 12, 2007 @ 11:00 am In Uranium Mining Stocks | 18 Comments

Cameco is in more trouble at Cigar Lake as they have announced that the mine will not be online until 2011.

More Trouble for Cameco at Cigar Lake

According to the news release by Cameco, more flooding anddewatering issues have further hampered the world’s largest undevelopeduranium project.

Cigar Lake was supposed to produce 9 million pounds of U3O8 annuallywith its originally estimated proven reserves of 113 million pounds.The project is a joint venture owned by Cameco, Areva Resources Canada,Idemitsu Canada Resources, and TEPCO Resources.

Taking Cigar Lake out of the uranium market is like taking SaudiArabia out of the oil market. It creates a devastating supply squeezethat could push the [1] uranium price and so [2] uranium shares to extreme heights.

We are of the opinion that Cameco don’t actually know the problem atthe project. They have to find out what the problem is before they caneven contemplate fixing it. At the moment their tactics are appear tobe on a “hit and miss basis” with the company trying all sorts ofstrategies that are to no avail.

Cameco COO Tim Gitzel said that they were “making steady progress in bringing the project into production”.Well this latest release sounds nothing like steadily progress to us,it is a step back as it means that Cameco shareholders have to waitanother year until Cameco think they can get the project back online…and it might not even come online then.

Bullboard Posts