Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF T.SST.U


Primary Symbol: SPTS

The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg Barclays 1-3 Year U. The fund invests at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index and in securities that the Adviser determines have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the economic characteristics of the securities that comprise the index. The index is designed to measure the performance of short term (1-3 years) public obligations of the U.S. Treasury.


ARCA:SPTS - Post by User

Post by HCaseon Mar 12, 2009 10:06am
302 Views
Post# 15839099

Disappointed with the deal

Disappointed with the deal

Very disappointed.  I was willing to wait 3-4 years for $3-$4, although believe it could have happened sooner, especially if they managed to pull off another deal or even two, which they probably could have done at favourable prices, in the next 12 – 18 months.

 

When I bought SST, I looked at SLW, but I purposefully chose SST and avoided SLW.

 

Still, this is not a cash deal, but a share deal, 0.185 SLW for 1 SST.  The same silver price and demand conditions (increasing) will exist to increase the price SLW as SST.  I don’t think it will be at the same leverage for SLW, so upside is less.  If the risk is less, I could live with this, but wonder if we are trading lower potential return for no less risk.

 

I will hang in there for now, but will be looking at whether to stick with SLW or move onto other plays I have been watching.

 

I looked for how tightly bound we are to this deal: “…definitive agreement entered into in connection with the transaction includes a commitment by Silverstone not to solicit alternative transactions to the proposed transaction. If the acquisition agreement is terminated in certain circumstances, Silverstone has agreed to pay Silver Wheaton a termination fee of C$6 million…Silver Wheaton has the right to match competing offers made to Silverstone.”

 

So, they can’t go looking for other deals, but if another happens by, they can accept it with a break fee of $6mm, which is not a huge amount.  SLW always has the right to match competing offers, which probably lowers the chance of someone else making one.  What are the chances of another royalty company offering more?  I can’t see a producer stepping in, unless they want the exploration properties and try to sell off the royalty portions separately.  Who else might bid for SST?

HC
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>