Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Forsys Metals Corp T.FSY

Alternate Symbol(s):  FOSYF

Forsys Metals Corp. is a Canada-based uranium developer. The Company is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties. It is focused on advancing its wholly owned Norasa Uranium Project, located in the jurisdiction of Namibia, Africa, which is wholly owned by its 100% owned operating subsidiary, Valencia Uranium (Pty) Ltd. The Norasa Uranium Project is comprised of the Valencia Uranium deposit (ML-149) and the nearby Namibplaas Uranium deposit (EPL-3638). The Valencia Uranium project is situated on the farm Valencia 122, which is located approximately 75 kilometers (km) north-east of the town of Swakopmund in central-west Namibia, covering an area of 735.6 hectares (ha). The Namibplaas Uranium project is located 7.5 km northeast of the Valencia deposit on the farm Namibplaas 93, with a total surface area of 1,269 ha.


TSX:FSY - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by thegovon Mar 12, 2009 6:34pm
310 Views
Post# 15841194

RE: RE: Info Circular - Schedule "D" - Yemoko

RE: RE: Info Circular - Schedule "D" - YemokoYour statements about the existence of "details of funding institutions etc." in takeover bids being always included are simply false. Your example is one case only and not the general rule.

Two examples I can think of are QGX and Centurion -- both cases were similar with shell companies with eventual foreign parents. As far as I can remember both indicated that they would use existing cash or other sources for funding and no details about their existing financial state or bank accounts or sources were provided. They closed.

Forrest can choose not to close the deal if so inclined -- they are on the hook for the breakup fee, which is minimal but they certainly would lose some credibility if they did so at such a late time.

Since today was the first day you posted on this or any other board, I assume you are short. Your continual use of the phrase "due diligence" is also a bit of a give away.

Good luck.
Bullboard Posts