Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF T.SST.U


Primary Symbol: SPTS

The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg Barclays 1-3 Year U. The fund invests at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index and in securities that the Adviser determines have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the economic characteristics of the securities that comprise the index. The index is designed to measure the performance of short term (1-3 years) public obligations of the U.S. Treasury.


ARCA:SPTS - Post by User

Comment by Lousytimingon Mar 12, 2009 11:22pm
210 Views
Post# 15841794

RE: RE: Really not that bad at all

RE: RE: Really not that bad at allI've read all the arguments on both sides and it has confirmed my initial impression. We are having our pockets picked in broad daylight.

This is a terrible deal.  In fact it is so bad that I doubt it will ultimately go through at the current premium.

I have been buying SST since about  $2.20.  I bought it all the way down to .40 and I've been buying it on the way back up.

I think we all learned during the carnage of  the last few months how important it is do buy companies with strong balance sheets so you know you can go through a downturn and come out the other side without being diluted into oblivion.

It seems some people here want to convince us that we should happily accept all our valuation metrics being degraded because we will be a bigger company.  A year ago, Teck was the "go to" name in base metals.  Now they are struggling to stay solvent because they have too much debt.

I cannot for the life of me see how management can say they are acting in the best interest of shareholders.  This is a BAD BAD BAD deal!  

Can someone please explain to me why I should like this deal, other than the fact that SLW is bigger? 

I have not read been reading the SLW board but I would guess there are far fewer p'd off posters over there.


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>