Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF T.SST.U


Primary Symbol: SPTS

The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg Barclays 1-3 Year U. The fund invests at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index and in securities that the Adviser determines have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the economic characteristics of the securities that comprise the index. The index is designed to measure the performance of short term (1-3 years) public obligations of the U.S. Treasury.


ARCA:SPTS - Post by User

Comment by dfergu7477on Mar 20, 2009 8:54pm
465 Views
Post# 15860072

RE: RE: FNV bid?

RE: RE: FNV bid?You said, "It is for this reason that Peter Barnes (CEO of SLW) answered a question about the Minto gold stream by saying that SLW will not be interested in making new gold deals. They will get gold from Minto because it comes with SST but they won't follow up."

You could be right, and that makes some sense.  It's also true that SST is about 50/50% gold/silver right now, so the same thing could be said--in reverse--about FNV having an interest in SST.  I think either one of these companies could buy SST for its gold OR silver stream at this point, and simply hang on to the rest (or, vend them out, maybe even to each other?) because they have added value.


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>