Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF T.SST.U


Primary Symbol: SPTS

The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg Barclays 1-3 Year U. The fund invests at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index and in securities that the Adviser determines have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the economic characteristics of the securities that comprise the index. The index is designed to measure the performance of short term (1-3 years) public obligations of the U.S. Treasury.


ARCA:SPTS - Post by User

Comment by tooclassyon Mar 20, 2009 9:10pm
461 Views
Post# 15860087

RE: FNV bid?

RE: FNV bid?
Dferg,

Good to see you around. I am thinking the same thing about Franco Nevada. And there must be some other royalty companies that I am not familiar with who are watching this situation and looking for a bargain opportunity, which is what this is.

Yesterday I wrote:
"The possibility of a new bidder is obviously also a free lottery ticket for Silverstone shareholders. In this regard the point I want to make to everyone is that the possibility of a new bidder is a strong reason not to sell any Silverstone shares. You don't think another bidder is likely? Several weeks ago I raised the possibility that sudden heavy trading volume in Silverstone suggested that a bid was coming, and nobody believed me then. I am doing the math, and asking myself, if I was Franco Nevada, what would I do. My conclusion is that if I was Franco Nevada I would jump all over Silverstone with an offer over $2.00 ($2.50 perhaps, for starters, in cash or shares?). It's the logical thing to do. They may not do the logical thing, but I am expecting that it's in the enlightened self interest of Franco to make an offer, and that's good for us Silverstone shareholders."

I keep thinking that it would be stupid for Franco Nevada not to make an offer. Which means that they probably will make an offer. (I know this logic looks simplistic; we will see if it proves to be correct!) If I was Franco I would wait first to see if it looks like either Silver Wheaton improves their purchase formula, or if another bidder enters the situation. THEN I would make a higher bid. My guess is it is in Franco's interests to wait it out a little bit - a week or two perhaps. This is like a poker game, and the game can change at any time for the better. Who is going to blink first? Like I said before, Silverstone is like a free lottery ticket. Wheaton has set the floor for the stock price, but not the ceiling for the stock price. With the Silverstone price already at $1.87, and with the analyst price target for Wheaton much higher, it is hard to imagine Silverstone not going to over $2.50 relatively soon, somehow or another.


tooclassy
PS: Let's step back a little..the stock has gone from about $1.00 to $1.87 in 8 trading days. Nice. Aren't we having fun yet?.


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>