Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

North American Gem Inc V.NAG



TSXV:NAG - Post by User

Comment by HighTeston Apr 01, 2009 10:30pm
237 Views
Post# 15889953

RE: whooops

RE: whooopsSeems that the rental cost went form a buck an acre to a buck a hectare somewhere..... Hmmm

So would be around $567,000 per year, going by hectares.

However, the application still says a buck an acre, in which case, It would cost around $1.4 million per year in rental fees. I'm not sure that the changes to the regulations have been made official yet.

Getting all that land to lease would cost around $28 million.

https://www.er.gov.sk.ca/adx/aspx/adxGetMedia.aspx?DocID=10312,10311,10310,10306,3385,5460,2936,Documents&MediaID=24965&Filename=Application+For+Coal+Permit+-+Surveyed+Area.pdf


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>