Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Active Control Technology Inc ATIVF



GREY:ATIVF - Post by User

Comment by mikerosoft666on Apr 05, 2009 2:10pm
257 Views
Post# 15897968

RE: RE: RE: Vassa - is ALWAYS RIGHT

RE: RE: RE: Vassa - is ALWAYS RIGHT
I'm not sure the "line of sight" issue is relevant.  What they will know is the last place 13 or so minors were working which gives them a much better idea of how they are going to rescue them.  I agree that with a cave in the network won't necessarily be available for the trapped minors  -  although if they are close enough to a working node which is in touch with the surface through an alternate route,  then what an advantage the rescue guys would have with the communications factor.  But one would have to agree that non-communications is as real a possibility depending on the magnitude of the disaster.

But I think this product offers a lot more than just locating  -  communications in the working mine would be a large justification factor as well as being able to piggy back other under ground management applications on the network.

Still think we are in for very pleasant surprises.  I suppose I could argue that some guy on the POT board also told me to get into RAY (.18¢) at $2 and ergo RAY=POT.   I realize the NAV's aren't in the same ball park - but as an example,  we know this company (ACT) had $20 Million in PO's while waiting for approval.  Does that mean that now that their approval is fact they can exceed this number ?  Was that a huge vote of confidence on the part of mine operators who are the ultimate decision makers in this product ?  I guess we are about to find out.

I personally agree with the RC Report that states that even without handset approval (not the profit center for this product) they can still use OTHER APPROVED HANDSETS to move forward with installations...

So I think a number of catalysts coming very soon (meaning over the next couple of months).

JMHO    I guess I don't mind shorters except when they are parasitic frauds like the one hanging around this board.  They don't know anything more than we do other than that they think we've run up too far too fast and what a great opportunity to short. 

It's when they start manipulatively using other companies failures as an example of what will happen to this one that you have to be very very careful you don't fall into the trap.  Remember that professionals who know a lot more than we do aren't reading these boards for their information and ultimately they will control the price of the company based on their due diligence and believe in it's ability to achieve economic goals.


Bullboard Posts