Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bridge Resources Corp V.BUK



TSXV:BUK - Post by User

Comment by commoditiesbullon Apr 30, 2009 10:41pm
635 Views
Post# 15958374

RE: Financial Put

RE: Financial PutIt means that the BUK hedge is higher than the same time period natural gas price estimate being used by GLJ. So for example if GLJ figures gas will be $6 and BUK has a hedge at $7, GLJ is using $6 for the reserves report and working back to the NAV. Basically, GLJ is using the $6 for the valuation even though BUK will actually be receiving $7. In short, the NAV that GLJ provides is slightly lower than the actual value, all else being accurate. That said, the precision of the GLJ number depends upon how accurate their gas price forecast is versus actual prices received.

The "incremental value" simply indicates that the hedge is above what GLJ had expected the company to receive. 4.8 bcf is roughly 850,000 boe equivalent. As example, think $6 estimated price ($36 boe) versus $7 ($42 boe), which is say a $6 difference, or about $5M on the volume of the hedges.

GLJ posts its price deck here:
https://www.gljpc.com/pdfs/pricing.pdf

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>