Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

PhosCan Chemical Corp PCCLF

Energy Oil & Gas E&P


GREY:PCCLF - Post by User

PhosCan Chemical Corp
Bullboard Posts
User Avatar Image
(0)
•••
Comment by moneymotivatoron May 09, 2009 4:21pm
586 Views
Post# 15980983

Question?

Question?my analysis may be off becuase I am not sure for example Athabasca Potash says they have a Indicated Mineral Resources of 241,200,000 tonnes at a grade of 23.3% K2O.

So would the true value of potash for the be 23.3% of 241 million tons which would be 56 million tons cuz those original  numbers seem way too big?
Bullboard Posts
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities