Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Snowfield Development Corp. SWFCF



GREY:SWFCF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Montrose2on May 11, 2009 10:27am
373 Views
Post# 15983098

RE: RE: drilling

RE: RE: drillingNot sure I would put much "stock" in that persons comment about "speaking with the company".

Given that the commencement of drilling and its goals were subject of a news release, it is highly unlikely that substantive "negative" results would be released to anyone calling in.  The negative result is certainly possible but it is probable that to ensure regulatory compliance those results would be subject of a formal news release.

A factor that I find interesting is that company insiders were still buying stock some two weeks after the drilling commenced.  I am not a geologist and I am aware that the presence of diamonds requires labratory examination buttttttttt I think "kimberlite" is an obvious and readily identifiable substance.  I believe the drill cores would immediately tell them whether they were on to kimberlite or something else.  If it were something else then why buy more stock.  At least thats the way I view it.

Onwards and Upwards.
Bullboard Posts