Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Isotechnika Pharma Inc IPHAF



GREY:IPHAF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by BornReady1970on May 21, 2009 7:36pm
455 Views
Post# 16007755

Why did ISA prepay debt?

Why did ISA prepay debt?It appears to me that the strategy going forward is to wiat for LUX to save management. If that is in fact the case why did management prepay the debt? I would think that $700k in interest is less costly than ~30% of the company, the IP, and the tax shelter. What is Paladin bringing to the table that make this a better strategy than debt?

Would anyone out there support an alternate option of $6m in debt with 40m warrants at $0.17 and a requirement that Frost step aside?

I'm serious about this, ISA would retain full control of its IP and could monotize the tax shelter for additional funds if required.

any thoughts?
Bullboard Posts