RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: SEC charges i-hub with pump/duMy post was far from inflammatory. You have read enough posts to know what inflammatory is, and mine was not. In any event, I stated my theory as a series of questions, and, the theory was/is certainly a reasonable one. I find it very odd that a post about a cheerleader here raises such concerns on I-Hub. I can only take it that there is an even tighter little group of cheerleaders than before and they all defend each other in order to circle their wagons to allow themselves the continued delusion that they own shares in an actual company that has a hope.
So to summarize: I did not say it was Dr. Mike, just a very odd coincidence that these newly registered posters come here within hours to defend a shrink from Ontario. It would be foolish and dismissing reality to not find it a coincidence of some proportion.
As for the cheer leading by Dr. Mike (it gets him all upset if you use the word pumper it seems). Well he has 11 million shares (so he says), which makes my heart go out to him, if he is just an investor. But who would buy 11 million shares of a stock that declines for three years, falls below a penny, borrows money at 14.5% to keep the lights on in an environment where interest rates are at their lowest in history in N. AM.? The only answers that come to me are either it is not true, because no one could be that married to a sinking ship, or his blinders are so strong, that if he convinces others to following by cheerleading, he feels less foolish. Who knows what the reality is as to why people buy some stocks - maybe out of hope of hitting it big. Hardly a sucessfull investment strategy. And one that should never recommend to family, friends, colleagues, for the simple reason of when it does not work out, everyone will not look at you as not just a fool, but a fool who is spreading their stupidity.