Let's look aheadI agree with Jasper. A 43-101 report that has been scrutinized before its filing is something that few, if any, juniors have.
Looking at the situation from the agency's viewpoint, once a question had been raised, independently or from an outside source, it was obligated to investigate, especially for a property that has the potential to be very large. And the agency,itself, has its own interest to protect, especially in these interesting times. It could not afford to appear like the U.S. SEC and look the other way.
So, it would seem best to leave our bruised feelings aside,
If they have all that is required by the Act, then I hope the follow out its directive to them, that the CTO be lifted as soon as practicable.
fwiw
jmho