Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Torq Resources Inc V.TORQ

Alternate Symbol(s):  TRBMF

Torq Resources Inc. is a Canada-based copper and gold exploration company with a portfolio of holdings in Chile. The Company's projects include Santa Cecilia and Margarita. The Santa Cecilia mineral exploration project is a 3,250-hectare property located approximately 100 kilometers (kms) east of the city of Copiapo, Chile, in the southern region of the world-class Maricunga belt and immediately north of the El Indio belt. The belt is characterized by gold epithermal and gold-copper porphyry deposits. The Margarita Iron-Oxide-Copper-Gold (IOCG) project is comprised of approximately 1,445 hectares and is located in Chile, 65 kms north of the city of Copiapo with access to infrastructure. The property is located within the prolific Coastal Cordillera belt that hosts the world-class Candelaria (Lundin Mining Corp.) and Mantoverde (Mantos Copper Holding) IOCG mines, and porphyry-skarn deposits such as Santo Domingo (Capstone Mining Corp.) and Inca de Oro (PanAust/Codelco).


TSXV:TORQ - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by au536on May 29, 2009 9:34pm
376 Views
Post# 16029170

Options

OptionsSeems the recent posts about options might be misconstrued. Yes, a hockey sock of new options were issued in December 2008 at 8 cents (old news), but, so far (in May 2009), no one has posted on SEDI that they recently received more options during the recurring annual options extravanganza in May of each year. Perhaps they read this forum and decided to delay or forgo this year's options activities. We just don't know.

Think it through...is your average cost per share greater than the current market value of approx 10 to 12 cents.
Have you bought more shares in an attempt to average down your cost?
So why wouldn't management take advantage of the current low pps to issue options to themselves to average down their out-of-money options or replace expired options.  Oh, and by the way, check the expiry dates on the new options issued.  When options expire, it's usually many, many years after they were issued. It was over that very long period of time that insiders were supposed to bring the company to a profitable, growing state. It's supposed to be a reward for a job well done.  If and when the pps moves up to and beyond the applicable exercise price then insiders will reap their reward. 
Bullboard Posts