GREY:SGGDF - Post by User
Post by
JerryFrancison Jun 02, 2009 9:09am
159 Views
Post# 16035844
3000m drill program sounds better than 1500m BUT
3000m drill program sounds better than 1500m BUT when I checked with the company, it was explained to me that it is not necessarily the debth and number of holes that the company is solely concerned about but rather the targets and the down dip degree of drilling. Bill Love and the on-site geo Ron Therriault, have been doing extensive geophysical ground and airborne work. Nothing is for absolute certain guys n' gals but all of us certainly have a vested interest in seeing a successful 2009 drill campaign.
The reason I had called the company about that was because as a layman, I honestly believed we should be doing more that 3000m if we have the cash to do so. I also thought that if we hit something good in a targeted area we should chase it down in hopes of hitting a 'source'. [kind of like finding a clue and chasing after the perpetrator LOL] Obviously that isn't necessarily the way it goes but I still have to wonder if they hit something great early on, that perhaps they would have to amend their previous models somewhat. I know this is not an earth shattering post. I am simply relating what was told to me. I am not required to be accurate and in fact this time got politely corrected by someone that knows much more than I and also has all the charts, graphs and survey results in front of him.
Best wishes,
Jerry Francis