Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Isotechnika Pharma Inc IPHAF



GREY:IPHAF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by macbethorfauston Jun 08, 2009 3:59pm
468 Views
Post# 16052857

RE: RE: RE: RE: Rolling submission for approval

RE: RE: RE: RE: Rolling submission for approval

'Of course, my personal opinion is that LUX doesn't have sufficient data to file for a fast track application."

And this personal opinion of yours is based on what exactly and is worth how much?

Look, the drug has long had fast track and there would have been ongoing contact with FDA as a result. When they say they are entering into discussions at this stage obviously they are talking about NDA discussions. There is incidentally no guarantee that fast track will get you priority NDA consideration just that one usually follows the other and if not we are still well within our survival time lines. And posterior or anterior, both are serious, both cause blindness if left untreated.

And by the way getting NDA for posterior uvietis will almost certainly mean off label use for the anterior uvietis as well.
Bullboard Posts