Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

High River Gold Mines Ltd HRIVF

Metals & Mining Gold


GREY:HRIVF - Post by User

High River Gold Mines Ltd > Market As Battleground
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
User Avatar Image
(0)
•••
Comment by brickson Jun 10, 2009 1:22am
242 Views
Post# 16057454

RE: RE: Market As Battleground

RE: RE: Market As Battlegrounddiscern,

are you saying the vote for this "offer" is connected to the AGM?
the release said " the Special Committee of independent directors recommended to the Board of High River that High River negotiate a support agreement with Severstal"
this is still a recommendation as far as it goes. the agenda from the AGM is different, is it not?

can you please explain
 
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities