Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Isotechnika Pharma Inc IPHAF



GREY:IPHAF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by go4futureon Jun 11, 2009 4:33pm
392 Views
Post# 16063513

RE: Two renal 2b presentations posted

RE: Two renal 2b presentations posted

IMO it has been my impression that the Promise Renal 2B results and associated trial demographics published tended to put Voclosporin at a disadvantage to the trial participant demographics associated with Tacrolimus. One of the slides in the 2nd June 2 presentation showed the demographic breakdown as well as a related article which discussed this aspect in another sponsored Transplant Trial.

For example in the Promise 2B trial it showed demographics factors favoured Tacrolimus for Reciepient Race (Black), Diabetes Mellitus Pre-Tx and % Deceased Donors.

I found an interesting arcticle (Dec 2007, but still applicable) that talked about trial demographics and results that were undrstated. The article was related to research trial on "Post-kidney transplant immunosuppression with low-dose tacrolimus (Prograf) may offer some short-term advantages over other regimens, researchers here found". The Doctor involved was independent from the sponsored study with the trial sponsor being, you guessed it was Roche.

Some quotes taken from the article (URL below are as follows:

"Serious adverse events were most frequent with sirolimus (53.2% versus 43.4% to 44.3%), but the proportion of
patients with at least one adverse event was similar across groups (86.3% to 90.5%)."











Bullboard Posts