Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Artaflex Inc V.ATF



TSXV:ATF - Post by User

Comment by wormbusteron Jul 26, 2009 8:13pm
126 Views
Post# 16167233

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Well..the push seems to be on?

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Well..the push seems to be on?Musing - a small correction if I may:
If RH pumps in more money in return for equity, they do not get diluted one bit, they increase their share of the company.
As for M&A through equity issuance, let's say that RH can afford to be diluted a bit without any serious consequence :-)
I do agree that in the short term RH has interest to see the share price appreciate...as they have a mitful of warrants they could exercise and then sell the shares received into the market for an immediate ROI exercise (possible cleaning up in part or in whole on their original investment. Just normal course of action for warrant holders. In fact they could well exercise warrants and sell their new shares to institutional investors in a secondary offering. Why not...it would make for a new bunch of Adeptron equity peddlers and promoters  out there. And god knows the company needs it.

OK, enough if this dilution stuff. Onwards with more business development please. That is much more palatable...
Cheers
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>