RE: Board of DirectorsWormbuster: good point. I think it is time to look at the contribution of board members. Why are they there and what has been their value added over these years.
I cannot help but be impressed with the value added quality of the RH board members and the latest just announced new board member Sam Vlodinger. Lets look at his background a little:
https://www.eco.public.lu/salle_de_presse/com_presse_et_art_actu/2004/01/28_RAVAL_EUROPE.pdf
Now, lets contrast that with a couple of the long standing ATQ board members:
Lets look at Tim Osby for example. He builds docks in Gainsville, Georgia and has a dealership in Peterborough, Ontario. Could someone enlighten me as to what his relevance is and what his contribution has been to build the market cap of ATQ? I have not found too many electronic parts in the docks that I am familiar with.
https://www.wahoodocks.com/aboutUs/owners/index.htm
https://www.wahoodocks.com/contact/phone/index.htm
https://www.wahoodocks.com/dealers/locate/
Now lets look at the board composition of comparative ems companies like IEC and LB. Do you see a difference? Do you now understand why the share price of IEC has gone from $0.07 in 2002 to $5.30 at present? Its called leadership from the board and from management. We now have that leadership from the RH members on the board. Did we ever have it with the other board members?
In 2002 ATQ traded at $0.40 per share and now, unlike IEC, it trades for $0.10 per share.
Lets look at some of the other long standing board members of ATQ and see what contribution they have made to ATQ. Who shall we look at next?
So in conclusion, I am pleased that such high quality, experienced professionals are joining the board of ATQ. We have had too many fee and option collectors approving audit statements for too long. Until recently, no one has been a stakeholder with the intent of building the market cap of this company.