Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Azteca Gold Corp V.AZG

Metals & Mining Industrial Metals & Minerals
Gold and silver exploration


TSXV:AZG - Post by User

Azteca Gold Corp
Bullboard Posts
User Avatar Image
(0)
•••
Comment by bjhernonon Sep 01, 2009 9:33am
255 Views
Post# 16266794

RE: was AZG in default

RE: was AZG in defaultPaul, I'm trying to find what you are referring to, but I don't see any reference to that in the M&DA or the Financials.

Does Azteca have a letter listed after the company profile on the website you were checking? 
I'm not sure where you were looking - but to me, it would ONLY mean AZG was in default IF there is a letter referencing the reason for default by the company's name on that list.
Bullboard Posts
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities